We can learn
1) How long
it takes in making of Historical films.
2) How
extensive Research is done by writer?
3)
Converting History into Literature is difficult task.
4) When
writer says that it is an attempt to see past through today's
spectacles/goggles; we remember the
relevance of Eliot ' s concept of Tradition which involves Historical sense
which involves past ness of past and it's presence, consciousness of past,
timeless n temporal, contemporaenity etc. Not merely protector or the one who
lives in Past but the one who sees past through present.
5) the
controversy is bound to happen , and there is nothing wrong in controversy. Literature, through
"imagination", tries to answer questions left unanswered by History.
We had to share our views on this small and
also we had to try to connect it with the study of literature and literary
criticism / theory.
Here were my
views on this:-
Interview of
writer of Bajirao-Mastani by Prakash Kapadia throws light on the connection of
the past and present. It takes a lot of effort to convert history into a film.
The writer has been working for so long to come out with an excellent story.
Whenever movies are made out of history, a lot of controversies are created.
People read history and starts pointing out faults, they forget that the aim of
the director is to entertain audience not to teach them history.
T.S.Eliot in
his essay “Tradition and Individual Talent” explains the connection of the
pastness of past with the present. Past helps us to understand present
situation. In present time, filmmaker and writer are presenting the past in a
new and interesting way.
In the movie
we can also observe how people are bound by the religion and also how religion
and humanity don’t go together. It is presented in a very effective. The
situation is the same in the past and in the present also. Mentality of the
people is same as was in past.
It’s a worth
watching film.
You also can
share your views here.
Comments
Post a Comment