On 2/4/2016,We
got an interesting online discussion by our mentor.
With
reference to Cultural Studies . . .
Why is
Cricket so popular in India?
Why are
cricketers so rich and popular in India?
Why
corporatization of Criticket in India?
Why this
much 'money' in Cricket in India?
Cricket is
colonial game. With political liberation of India from British Raj, almost
everything that was connected with British Raj was hated. English language
being no exemption form it. So, why is Cricket so dearly loved that Indians
call it 'Religion' and crickets demi-gods?
As a
cultural critic, we are suppose to doubt. We have to give some critical insight
to the artefact under the scanner. As we know that Cultural Studies takes help
of post-structuralist theories, it tends to deconstruct hegemony of one binary
over the other, it tends to question the privileged position of one identity
over the underprivileged.
Thus, in India,
it is seen that since the days of Manu, society is divided in four
Varna-system, with Brahmins at the top, followed by Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and
Dalits at the bottom. This obviously is very fertile ground for cultural critic
to explore the possibilities of culture being constructed, promoted and
naturalised by Brahmins and Kshatriyas. Kshatriyas were also in political
power, the power was supported by Brahmins. So, if we question - how privileged
are Brahmins and Kshatriyas in contemporary Indian society? We find that they
are. Especially, the rituals (from Garbha-Sanskaar to Lagna-Sanskaar to
Antim-Sanskaar) keeps Brahmins at the center of socio-cultural discourse.
With this
evidence of Brahmins at the centre of socio-cultural discourse, let us examine
if this has played any important role in keeping Cricket also alive - not only
alive, but popular, and widely accepted colonial relic in India.
Several
studies and surveys done on this prove that Brahmins players in final eleven or
15 players team were more in number than other Varnas.
Following
links will help you to get a few more arguments.
https://www.facebook.com/Brahmins-Control-Cricket-in-India-172338502809310/
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Tamil-Nadu-cricket-association-filled-with-Brahmins
https://churumuri.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/just-4-of-population-but-7-brahmins-in-indian-xi/
https://dalitnation.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/the-eleven-brahmins-and-eleven-million-fools/
So, can we
conclude that the power position of Brahmins, the privileged position in
society has kept cricket alive , popular, rich and also respectful position
like RELIGION and cricketers, GODs in India?
Well, if you
do not agree with this logic or line of thinking; then, what is your
interpretation of popularity and position of Cricket in India?
We had to
share our views on this.
Here are my
views about this discussion:-
With
reference to Postcolonial perspective, we can see that though Cricket is the
national game of England, but it is highly popular in India. So, it can be said
that the National game of colonizers is popular in the colonized country.
As discussed
in the class by Dilip sir, one of the reasons of its popularity is the
Brahminical tradition or elitism. The sports culture is also controlled by the
elitist. So, superior place is given to this game. While in other games, we
find non-elite people. So, they are considered inferior.
IPL (Indian
Premier League) is going to start soon. Many litres of water is wasted for this
tournament. The area where this tournament is organised is ‘Maharashtra’ - a
severely drought hit area.
So, the question
is that is it appropriate to call Cricket as religion in India?
Why the
so-called Nationalists are not talking about banning cricket in India?
Share your
views on this.
Comments
Post a Comment