Skip to main content

All literature is one literature


On 14/7/16, our teacher initiated an online discussion with reference to a short story “A Joke” by Anton Chekhov.
This Discussion helped us a lot to understand a poem “The Wasteland” by T.S.Eliot.
Here’s the link of the story:-

We studied in Eliot’s Tradition and Individual Talent: “what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the works of art which preceded it. The existing monuments form an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new (the really new) work of art among them. The existing order is complete before the new work arrives; for order to persist after the supervention of novelty, the whole existing order must be, if ever so slightly, altered; and so the relations, proportions, values of each work of art toward the whole are readjusted; and this is conformity between the old and the new.”
Let us read this as all literatures are connected with each other; all, those which are already written, those being written and those yet to be written. Thus, to understand a work of art, one must have an understanding of this continuity. This means that a writer makes use of one sign, symbol, character, situation for a specific purpose. If the same sing, symbol, character, situation is used by other writers, and if this goes on recurrently happen, it turns into literary metaphor.
Later, Northrop Frye also conifirmed this argument.
·        “Every organized body of knowledge can be learned progressively; and experience shows that there is also something progressive about the learning of literature.

He developed theory of Archetypal criticism based on the idea that whole of the literature has oneness of its existence. All literature shares common DNA or skeleton.

Here is an interesting example to prove this point.

These lines from The Waste Land can better be understood if we read it in the context of short story of Anton Checkhov (A Joke).

And when we were children, staying at the archduke's, 
My cousin's, he took me out on a sled, 
And I was frightened. He said, Marie, 
Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. 
In the mountains, there you feel free.

Read the short story (English and Gujarati translation of original Russian short story is attached) and give your interpretation on these lines in reply to this email.
Clues:
·        Marie feels nostalgic about childhood/adolescence experience of going in the mountains over the sled. Can you read this as not merely childhood freedom from worldly preoccupations and give interpretation of the first lover or infatuation or attraction which is on the verge of lustful relation?

·        Do you see any connection in these lines with overall theme of the poem which is spiritual degradation where all are burning with lustful fire?

·        Any other possible interpretation?

Here are my views about this:-
If we compare Marie's incident with Nadia's story, normally it might be taken as an nostalgic childhood experience.

If we plunge deep into this, we can see the symbolism lying in both the incidents.

Marie and Nadia at first are afraid of this lustful relation but slowly they start enjoying and it becomes a monotonous part of everyone's life. There is a common symbol of 'Sled' in both the work. Generally 'Sled' is used for the fun and adventurous activity to come down from the peak or from height of a snowy mountain. Thus, 'Sled' in both the work is the symbol of sexual perversion resulting into spiritual degradation.

And when we were children, staying at the archduke's, 
My cousin's, he took me out on a sled, 
And I was frightened. He said, Marie, 
Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. 
In the mountains, there you feel free.

The above lines are connected with the overall theme of the poem 'The Wasteland'. Marie's incident reflects the Europe of Eliot's time, where people were indulge in lustful relations. All were burning with lust.
Words like 'hold on tight' reflects sexual perversion and 'down we went' reflects spiritual degradation. Thus, these lines are connected with the overall theme of Spiritual degradation and sexual perversion.

Another thing observed in the short story by Anton Chekhov. Everytime the narrator used to say 'I love you' to Nadia. In the end, he thinks why he used to say this. Thus, it can be pointed out that there is difference between 'love' and 'lust'. Normally it gets confused.

The wastelanders were burning with lust. There was no love, because love leads to sacrifice and spirituality. Lust leads to spiritual degradation. This confusion between lust and love was there in the past, during the modern time as well as it will be in future.

Thank you...

You can read this story and “The Waste Land”  to share your views here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

" Siddhartha" Hermann Hesse - Book Review

Hello Readers, The growing cases of Covid-19 and lockdown had and has been making us go through tremendous stress. The stress itself is making our world upside down, rather than the problem. At this hour it necessary to indulge ourselves in something which allows us to be at peace. An avid reader in me got the perfect time to read books apart from research and syllabus. I picked a long awaited book from my library; “Siddhartha” by Hermann Hesse. Gautam Buddha, his teachings and life has always fascinated me a lot. So had to grab it without fail. Let me give you all a quick review of this book. Something about the author :- Hermann Hesse is an amazing writer from Germany. He wrote many novels and essays; best known for “Siddhartha”. He won the prestigious Noble Prize for Literature in 1946. Hesse began writing Siddhartha in December 1919 in Switzerland. During his childhood, he frequently heard stories about the beauty of spirituality in Indian Culture, from his father and mot...

The Mountains are calling and I must go… #AcademicTour #Junagadh #2019

The Mountains are calling and I must go… Recently I had a delightful experience of visiting Junagadh for Academic tour organized by Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University. Being a Research Scholar and a Faculty member, this was my first tour in a different role. It is said that a physician treats but nature heals. It is absolutely true. Stuck in health issues for so many months, and finally the mountains were calling and I had to go. I feel rejuvenate after this trip. The best part about academic tour is that you not only visit historical and important places, but you visit so many academic Institutions, meet so many learned teachers and students. This tour was planned for two days; 5 th and 6 th February. We started on 5 th early morning and were back on 6 th at night. There we visited many marvelous places and I would like to separate it as given beneath. As it is academic visit, let me start with it. Academic Institutions...

"RIP"; Rest in Peace those who are Alive....

Hello Friends, After a long time I am writing here. Hope you all are fine. This time I have come up with a different interpretation of the phrase “RIP”. Mostly this phrase “RIP”; Rest in Peace is used for the people who are no more. We use this phrase to give sympathy towards the departed soul. The soul may get peace wherever it travels. No one exactly knows where the soul travels. Sometimes this phrase is used out of care and sometimes just for show off on social media. While sitting alone near a cemetery, a thought struck in my mind. Why do we use RIP only for dead people????? We can also use it for those who are alive. Many time people use RIP when a person is dead. The same people might have harassed the dead person when he is alive. So what’s the point of “RIP”? Suppose in the day time you behave very badly with someone. Is he/she going to get sound and peaceful sleep at night? The dead person will never come back so we just say “RIP”. Of course ever...