On 14/7/16, our teacher initiated an online discussion
with reference to a short story “A Joke” by Anton Chekhov.
This Discussion helped us a lot to understand a poem “The
Wasteland” by T.S.Eliot.
Here’s the link of the story:-
We studied in Eliot’s Tradition and Individual Talent:
“what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens
simultaneously to all the works of art which preceded it. The existing
monuments form an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the
introduction of the new (the really new) work of art among them. The existing
order is complete before the new work arrives; for order to persist after the
supervention of novelty, the whole existing order must be, if ever so slightly,
altered; and so the relations, proportions, values of each work of art toward
the whole are readjusted; and this is conformity between the old and the new.”
Let us read this as all literatures are connected with
each other; all, those which are already written, those being written and those
yet to be written. Thus, to understand a work of art, one must have an
understanding of this continuity. This means that a writer makes use of one
sign, symbol, character, situation for a specific purpose. If the same sing,
symbol, character, situation is used by other writers, and if this goes on
recurrently happen, it turns into literary metaphor.
Later, Northrop Frye also conifirmed this argument.
· “Every
organized body of knowledge can be learned progressively; and experience shows
that there is also something progressive about the learning of literature.
He developed theory of Archetypal criticism based on
the idea that whole of the literature has oneness of its existence. All
literature shares common DNA or skeleton.
Here is an interesting example to prove this point.
These lines from The Waste Land can better be
understood if we read it in the context of short story of Anton Checkhov (A
Joke).
And when we were children, staying at the
archduke's,
My cousin's, he took me out on a sled,
And I was frightened. He said, Marie,
Marie, hold on tight. And down we went.
In the mountains, there you feel free.
Read the short story (English and Gujarati translation
of original Russian short story is attached) and give your interpretation on
these lines in reply to this email.
Clues:
· Marie
feels nostalgic about childhood/adolescence experience of going in the
mountains over the sled. Can you read this as not merely childhood freedom from
worldly preoccupations and give interpretation of the first lover or infatuation
or attraction which is on the verge of lustful relation?
· Do you
see any connection in these lines with overall theme of the poem which is
spiritual degradation where all are burning with lustful fire?
· Any
other possible interpretation?
Here are my
views about this:-
If we
compare Marie's incident with Nadia's story, normally it might be taken as an
nostalgic childhood experience.
If we plunge
deep into this, we can see the symbolism lying in both the incidents.
Marie and
Nadia at first are afraid of this lustful relation but slowly they start
enjoying and it becomes a monotonous part of everyone's life. There is a common
symbol of 'Sled' in both the work. Generally 'Sled' is used for the fun and
adventurous activity to come down from the peak or from height of a snowy
mountain. Thus, 'Sled' in both the work is the symbol of sexual perversion
resulting into spiritual degradation.
And when we
were children, staying at the archduke's,
My cousin's,
he took me out on a sled,
And I was
frightened. He said, Marie,
Marie, hold
on tight. And down we went.
In the
mountains, there you feel free.
The above
lines are connected with the overall theme of the poem 'The Wasteland'. Marie's
incident reflects the Europe of Eliot's time, where people were indulge in
lustful relations. All were burning with lust.
Words like
'hold on tight' reflects sexual perversion and 'down we went' reflects
spiritual degradation. Thus, these lines are connected with the overall theme
of Spiritual degradation and sexual perversion.
Another
thing observed in the short story by Anton Chekhov. Everytime the narrator used
to say 'I love you' to Nadia. In the end, he thinks why he used to say this.
Thus, it can be pointed out that there is difference between 'love' and 'lust'.
Normally it gets confused.
The
wastelanders were burning with lust. There was no love, because love leads to
sacrifice and spirituality. Lust leads to spiritual degradation. This confusion
between lust and love was there in the past, during the modern time as well as
it will be in future.
Thank you...
You can read
this story and “The Waste Land” to share
your views here.
Comments
Post a Comment