Skip to main content

Tragedy Drama in detail

 What is Tragedy?

The central character in tragedy, according to Aristotle is a person of admirable character and important position who is reined by single flaw of characters.
Aristotle's definition of Tragedy

Aristotle was a philosopher. He was philosopher of ancient Greece. He was highly philosophical idea and views. He asks and tried to show reality of the world. The search for ideal forms laid Aristotle to explore many subject. His analysis of the ideal form of tragic play became a guideline for later playwrights in western civilization. Many we western writer used to follow ideals of Aristotle’s model. Shakespeare also tried to follow rules of Aristotle’s.



Drama was not invented by Aristotle. In fact, he used examples from the works of famous Greek playwright such as Sophocles to illustrate his main ideas. The Greek believed that tragedy was the high form of drama and Aristotle’s ideas about tragedy were based on his belief.

Tragedy: -
- An event in life that evokes feelings of sorrow of grief.
- A disastrous circumstance or event.

“A tragedy is the imitation of an action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself;  in appropriate and pleasurable language…in dramatic rather than the narrative form; with incident arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish a catharsis of this emotion.
                                                                                                -  By Aristotle
Let’s clarify the definition of the Aristotle’s……

* “The imitation of n action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself”
            This lines shows that a good tragedy should have one issue that is very serious. You can’t have a tragedy about something trivial breaking a fingernail. Magnitude deals with the importance. The issue has to be serious and very important. So tragedies deal with sorrow or someone’s death. Complete in itself means that play must stick to the one issue; otherwise, the audience will get lost in the plot.


* “In appropriate and pleasurable language”

            In ancient time, chorus was used to narrate story of some parts of play, their role was to comment on the action of the play. Sometimes they sing a song. Language which is used by chorus should be rhyming and pleasurable to the audience. So the language should be appropriate and pleasurable.

* “In dramatic rather than the narrative form”

The language which is used by chorus should be dramatic language, because narrative form becomes complicated and suitable form. So, chorus has to use dramatic form rather than narrative form. To narrate a story is simply to tell the story, like weekend. In a play, the story must be dramatized or acted out.

* “With incident arousing pity and fear”
The ancient of play would be having some element of sorrow. The audience has to sympathy with main character. In a tragedy, the events or episodes in the play should lead the audience to feel very sorry for the main character - The tragic hero. The audience should also feel afraid for the hero as he moves toward destructive end.

* “Wherewith to accomplish a catharsis of this emotion”

Catharsis: -  

                 A purifying of the emotion s that is brought about in the audience of               
Tragic drama through the evocation of intense fear and pity

Means that during and after watching play audience has to feel catharsis, the audience has to successfully felt pity and fear. As the play moves along, the event should build up the emotion of pity and fear. A catharsis is a purging, or cleansing of emotion - a release of tension, in a tragedy. This is often a moment of revelation when the tragic hero “falls flat on his face” and the audience can finally “explode”.

So, as per above clarification, we can analyze the definition of Tragedy.

Aristotle’s Element of Tragedy

·         Element of Tragedy (six parts of Tragedy)
(1)        Plot:-
(2)        Character:-
(3)        Thought:-
(4)        Diction:-
(5)        Melody:-
(6)        Spectacle:-


Let’s discuss all element of tragedy one by one. And discuss importance and role of them into tragedy.
                     
(1) Plot:-
Plot is soul of tragedy. It was the most important of six elements. The plot must be complete having unity of action. Aristotle said that plot must be structurally self contained, with the incident bound together by internal necessity, each action leading inevitably to the next with no outside intervention. No deu ex machine. There must be good chain of unity of action.
(i)                 Time
(ii)        Place
(ii)               Action
The episode or acts succeed one another without probable and necessary sequence. The only thing that ties together the events in such a plot is the fact that they happen to the same person. Playwrights should make all scenes which depend on past accident. They have to exclude coincidence from their plot. Plot may be either simple or complex, although complex is better.


(2) Character:-
Character is another important element of tragedy. Character may be mouthpiece of writer. Every character may have their own contribution to develop plot and play, their quality or nature that is revealed in the plot. The purpose of each character must be clear to the audience.
-           Character should have following qualities.
 “Good or fine”
 This quality shows morality of character. That whatever protagonist is, it should have moral values. The character must be good and fine someway.
“True to Type (Fitness of Character)”
 This quality tells that character should be true type. That his body and physique would be suitable as per requirement of character.
e.g. – Valor is appropriate for a warrior bit nit for woman.
“True to Life (Realistic)”
According to this quality character should be realistic. They have to avoid fancy matter in character. The character ha to o live in real life and near surroundings and it must have reality.
“Consistency (True to Himself)”
Each character must act consistently throughout the play. In other words, nothing should be one or said that could be seen as ‘acting out of character’.


(3) Thought
It is also called ass theme of play. Theme of play is considered as thought. There is also useful theme in every play. Thought is the power of saying whatever can be said and should be said at each moment of the plot. Do the lines spoken by actors make sense? Are they saying what should be said at each particular moment in the play?


(4) Diction:-
It is fourth and important elements of tragedy.
Diction means Composition of dialogue - Choice of word.
The word contains meaning the clarity with which somebody pronounce words of the meaning in the words which are proper and appropriate to the plot, character, and end of the tragedy. In this category artist discusses the stylistic elements of tragedy; is particularly interested in metaphors; but the greatest thing by far is to have a comment of metaphor….It is the mark of genius, for to make good metaphors implies an eye for resembles.

- Application to Oedipus the King.


(5) The Spectacles (Opsis):-
(6) Melody (Melos):-
Both elements are accessories. The ancient Greek writer used melody songs sometimes. They used musical accompaniment. Aristotle said that the music has to blend in the play appropriately. Writer should include the musically expressive quality of something in the pay., especially like Poetry….

-          Spectacles is last; for it is least connected with literature; “the production of spectacular effects depends machinist than on that of poet.
-          It is somebody or something that attracts attention by being unpleasant or ridicules.
-          Aristotle recognizes the emotional attraction of spectacle, he argues that superior poet rely on the inner structure of the play rather than spectacles to arouse pity and fear; those who rely heavily on spectacle “crate a sense, not of the terrible, but only monstrous.


*catharsis*


Catharsis is a function of literature. It is a process to viewer or reader.
-          The aesthetic pleasure one gests from contemplating the pity and fear that are aroused through an intricately constructed works of art.

-          According to Aristotle, a purifying of the emotion that is brought about in the audience of a tragic drama through the evocation of intense fear and pity.  Catharsis as moderating or Tempe fulfillment or satisfaction.

The meaning of Catharsis

“First there has been age-long controversy about Aristotle’s meaning, though it has almost always been accepted that whatever he meant was profoundly right. Many, for example, have translated catharsis as ‘purification’, ‘correction refinement’, ‘reingung’ or like. It has been suggested that our pity and fear are ‘purified ‘in the theatre by becoming disinterested. It is  bad to be selfish sentimental, timid and querulous; but it is good to pity Othello or to fear for Hamlet. Our selfish emotion has been sublimated. All this is most edifying; but it does not appear to be what Aristotle intended.”
§  By F. L. Lucas

-          There is strong evidence that catharsis is not ‘purification’ but ‘purgation’. Purgation has become radically misleading to modern minds. Inevitably we think of purgatives and complete evacuation of water products; and then outraged critics ask why our emotions should be so ill treated.
-        

  But catharsis means purgation, not in the modern, but in the older, wilder English sense which includes the partial removal of excess ‘humor’. To translate catharsis as purgation is misleading meaning. The theory of humor is outdated in the medical science. “Purgation” has assumed different meaning. It is no longer what Aristotle has in mind.
The passions to be moderated are these of pity and fears to be moderated are again, of specific kind. There can never be an excess in the pity that results into a useful action. But there can be too much pity as an helpless feeling, and there can be also too much of self pity which is not a praise worthy virtue. The catharsis or moderation of such pity out to be achieved in the theater otherwise when possible, for such moderation keeps the mind in a healthy state of balance.  

“There are Besides fear and pity the allied impulses which is also are to be moderated Grief, Weakness, Contemplate, Blame these I take to be the sort of thing that Aristotle meant by feelings of that sort. “

§  By F. L. Lucas
Shakespearean Tragedy :-
                             Shakespearean tragedies were also influenced by Greek tragedies.Some similarities can be noted between both Aristotle and Shakespearean tragedy.Shakespearean tragedies also have a renowned or prosperous hero who experiences a reversal of fortune due to a tragic flaw.Macbeth, King Lear, Hamlet, Othello, Antony and Cleopatra are some of Shakespeare’s famous tragedies.
                         However, some differences can be noted between Aristotle and Shakespearean interweaved many subplots into the play to make the plot more complicated and realistic.The protagonists in Shakespearean tragedies usually face a tragic death, not just a reversal of fortune.Morever, these protagonists don't gain self-knowledge or recognize their flow like protagonists in Aristotelian tragedies.
                    The inclusion of comic scenes is another difference between Aristotle and Shakespearean tragedies.Aristotelian tragedies usually had a chorus which narrated the scenes that take place offstage and they also provided relief to the spectators.In shakespearean tragedies, the chorus is replaced by comic scenes such as the porter's scene in Macbeth.
   
Characteristics of Shakespearean tragedy :-
1.conflict between good and evil
2.True to life (nature )
3.The Tragic Hero
4.The Tragic Flaw
5.The Tragic Waste
6.Character and Destiny:the extremes and the golden mean :the threshold:the twilight:the grey rather than the black and the white.
              Ex.Destiny works as devil,ghosthe, chances, accidents.
     ●This is a big difference between Greek tragedy and Shakespearean tragedy.
7.Three complicating factors:
      ■some abnormal condition of mind.
      ■The supernatural ,ghost and witches.
      ■The role of chance.
8.The conflict :Inner as well as with others.
9.Catharsis
10.The Melodramatic element.
11.No poetic justice
12.Serenity at the end.
      ●where hero became more Nobel.
  Ex.In Hamlet,End of the play's dialogue :of Horatio and Hamlet.
Horatio:If your mind dislike anything, obey
                it.I will forstall their repair hither
                and say your are not fit........
                 
  A shakespearean tragedy is a play penned by Shakespeare himself, or a play written in the style of Shakespeare by a different author.Shakespearean tragedy has got its own specific features, which distinguish it from other kinds of tragidies. It must be kept in mind that Shakespeare is mostly indebted to Aristotle's theory of tragedy in his works. The elements of a Shakespearean tragedy:

Elements
Explanation
Tragic Hero
A main character cursed by fate and possessed of a tragic flaw.
A Struggle Between Good and Evil
This struggle can take place as part of the plot or exist within the main character.
Hamartia
The fatal character flaw of the tragic hero.
Tragic Waste
The good being destroyed along with the bad at the resolution of the play. Often played out with the unnecessary loss of life, especially of "good guy" characters.
External Conflict
This can be a problem facing the hero as a result of the plot or a "bad guy" character.
Internal Conflict
The struggle the hero engages in with his/her fatal flaw.
Catharsis
The release of the audience's emotions through empathy with the characters.
Supernatural Elements
Magic, witchcraft, ghosts, etc.
Lack of Poetic Justice
Things end poorly for everyone, including the "good guys."
Comic Relief
One or more humorous characters who participate in scenes intended to lighten the mood.
                           A shakespearean tragedy is a specific type of tragedy  (a written work with a sad ending where the Hero either dies or ends up mentally,emotionally or spirituality devastated beyond recovery)that also includes all of the additional elements.

As per above discussion we can say that the element of Tragedy is useful to develop plot. It gives contribution to raise action off drama.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"RIP"; Rest in Peace those who are Alive....

Hello Friends, After a long time I am writing here. Hope you all are fine. This time I have come up with a different interpretation of the phrase “RIP”. Mostly this phrase “RIP”; Rest in Peace is used for the people who are no more. We use this phrase to give sympathy towards the departed soul. The soul may get peace wherever it travels. No one exactly knows where the soul travels. Sometimes this phrase is used out of care and sometimes just for show off on social media. While sitting alone near a cemetery, a thought struck in my mind. Why do we use RIP only for dead people????? We can also use it for those who are alive. Many time people use RIP when a person is dead. The same people might have harassed the dead person when he is alive. So what’s the point of “RIP”? Suppose in the day time you behave very badly with someone. Is he/she going to get sound and peaceful sleep at night? The dead person will never come back so we just say “RIP”. Of course ever...

“My friend, the things that do attain” - Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey.

Hello friends, I would like to share a poem which I studied during my graduation. The title of the poem is “My friend, the things that do attain”. It is written by Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey. Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey (1516/1517 – 19 January 1547), was an English aristocrat, and one of the founders of English Renaissance poetry. MY friend, the things that do attain The happy life be these, I find: The riches left, not got with pain; The fruitful ground; the quiet mind; The equal friend; no grudge; no strife; No charge of rule, nor governance; Without disease, the healthy life; The household of continuance; The mean diet, no dainty fare; Wisdom joined with simpleness; The night discharged of all care, Where wine the wit may not oppress: The faithful wife, without debate; Such sleeps as may beguile the night; Content thyself with thine estate, Neither wish death, nor fear his might. In the above mentioned poem, there is a list ...

" The Winged Word"- David Green

In my Graduation syllabus, I had a book named “ The Winged word”. This anthology is edited by David Green. It is anthology of poems compiled for the students of English literature in the B.A courses of Indian Universities. The chronological order, in which the poets are arranged in this book, helps the students to note the development of English poetry from one age to another. Referring to this book after a long time span, gives me a immense joy. There are many poems in this book. We were given some selected poems to study during three years of graduation. The poems which were in my syllabus are as follow:-    1.)   I Find No Peace – Sir Thomas Wyatt (1503-42)    2.) My Friend, the Things That Do Attain –Henry Howard (1517- 47)    3.) The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd –Sir Walter Ralegh (1552-1618)    4.) The Nightingale – Sir Philip Sidney (1554- 86)    5.) Since There’s No Help – Michael...